Workstream #4 Report—Background Research: University Program Review Process

As part of the APPR project, Hanover was asked to assist with developing an ongoing process to regularly review Penn State’s portfolio of programs. This report, prepared by Hanover Research, presents findings from a literature review and outlines best practices used by four public institutions with broad academic portfolios. The report includes common elements of a program review, criteria used by other institutions, and best practices, which includes self-study, external evaluation and recommendation elements. This report is being used by the APPR process development and systemic analysis tool development teams to assist in crafting recommendations for a university wide set of guidelines for program review. It is publicly shared for purposes of transparency.

The second report in this series is currently in progress. It involves a more in-depth analysis of the program review process at other institutions of comparable size. In-depth interviews will be conducted with relevant higher education administrators to learn more about their structural models to conduct program reviews, and their uses of program review outcomes, including identification of opportunities for continuous improvement and strategic decision-making.

Report and supplemental materials

For those who would like to review and learn more about the report, the APPR tri-chairs recommend you read the report, and accompanying documents, in the following order:

1. APPR Report 4 – Part 1 – Preamble
2. APPR Report 4 – Part 1 – Background Research – University Program Review Process – Penn State
3. Report 4 – Part 1 – Data and Information Team Compendium

Share your feedback

We value your feedback on this report. If you would like to share your feedback, please complete this feedback form. If you have any questions, please email appr@psu.edu.